Analisis Perbandingan Pandangan Klasik dan Neoklasik terhadap Peran Pasar dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jumbiku.v5i2.5349Keywords:
Classical Economics, Neoclassical Economics, Economic DevelopmentAbstract
This study aims to compare classical and neoclassical economic perspectives on the role of the market in economic development and assess their relevance in the current Indonesian development context. The research uses a qualitative approach through library research by analyzing various economic literature sources. The findings reveal that classical economics emphasizes the importance of free markets without government intervention, while neoclassical economics incorporates individual rationality, marginal efficiency, and technological progress, while allowing for limited government intervention to address market failures. Both schools of thought agree that the market plays a central role in efficiently allocating resources. These findings provide important contributions for formulating adaptive and inclusive economic policies in developing countries such as Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, J. (2016). Refleksi dan relevansi pemikiran filsafat hukum bagi pengembangan ilmu hukum. Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 6(1), 181–199.
Ahmad, D. (2022). Ekonomi politik: Analisis kebijakan kawasan industri halal (KIH) dan perbankan syariah di Indonesia 2014–2021.
Bappenas. (2015). Rancangan teknokratik Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional (RPJMN) 2020–2024. http://perpustakaan.bappenas.go.id/e-library/file_upload/koleksi/migrasi-data-publikasi/file/RP_RKP/Narasi%20RPJMN%20IV%202020-2024_Revisi%2014%20Agustus%202019.pdf
Blados, C. (2019). The classical and neoclassical theoretical traditions and the evolutionary study of the dynamics of globalization. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 6(3), 257–280.
Hamzah, A. (2021). Pemikiran ekonomi Islam kontemporer: Kajian teoritis Muhammad Abdul Mannan tentang distribusi. Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.32694/qst.v18i1.801
Hudea, O. S. (2015). Classical, neoclassical and new classical theories and their impact on macroeconomic modelling. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 309–312.
Juliyanto, M. S., Syafi, R. A. A., Fatkhurrozi, M., Abadi, M. T., & Syafi’i, M. A. (2024). Sejarah pemikiran ekonomi neo-klasik, kapitalisme, sosialisme, dan Keynesian. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 1(3), 377–385.
Mulyaningsih. (2019). Pembangunan ekonomi. CV Kimfa Mandiri. https://repository.uniga.ac.id/file/dosen/2001817809.pdf
Muttaqin, R. (2018). Pertumbuhan ekonomi dalam perspektif Islam. Ekonomika (Yogyakarta: BPFE, 1984), 213, 219.
Pradana, T. G. A. (2024). Teori pemikiran ekonomi klasik “invisible hand” dan relevansinya pada APBN di Indonesia. JEB17: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 9(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.30996/jeb17.v9i02.6791
Pujiati, A. (2011). Menuju pemikiran ekonomi ideal: Tinjauan filosofis dan empiris. Fokus Ekonomi, 10(2), 24459.
Putri, A. L., Ulum, K. M., Khairunnisa, M., & Suganda, R. (2024). Chūn Zǐ Ér Nǚ (春子儿女): Islamic and Indonesian legal perspective. Mauriduna: Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 159–180.
Syawie, M. (2011). Pertumbuhan ekonomi dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Sosio Informa, 16(2).
Ulum, K. M. (2020). Analisa teknikal dalam jual beli saham menurut hukum Islam. Journal of Islamic Business Law, 4(4). http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jibl
Ulum, K. M. (2023). Urgensi regulasi standard screening terhadap penawaran efek syariah pada layanan securities [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga].
Ulum, K. M., Ariyanti, S., Suganda, R., Rahmawati, D., & Khotimah, H. (2024). Sengketa dalam kontrak pendanaan digital: Analisis hukum keperdataan dan alternatif penyelesaiannya. Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, 10(2), 162–188. http://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/almaqasid/article/view/11601
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
