Peran Infrastruktur Teknologi dalam Mengakselerasi Ekosistem Kewirausahaan dan Produktivitas Ekonomi

Authors

  • Muhammad Irfan Universitas Komputer Indonesia
  • Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto Universitas Komputer Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jumbiku.v6i1.6715

Keywords:

Economic Productivity , Entrepreneurship Ecosystem, Logarithmic Transformation, Structural Equation Modeling, Technology Infrastructure

Abstract

This study analyzes the strategic role of technology infrastructure in accelerating entrepreneurship ecosystem maturity and its impact on national economic productivity. Addressing data distribution biases in the digital economy, the research employs rigorous Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using World Bank WDI data. The model examines three constructs: the exogenous variable Technology Infrastructure (TECH) (measured by secure internet servers, fixed broadband, and high-tech exports); the mediating variable Entrepreneurship Ecosystem (ENT) (proxied by domestic credit and trademark applications); and the endogenous variable Economic Productivity (PROD) (evaluated via GDP per person employed, patents, and industry value added).To ensure multivariate normality and minimize outlier effects, the study applied Natural Logarithm (Ln) transformations to skewed variables. Analysis using Jamovi reveals that technology infrastructure is a critical foundation that significantly creates a conducive entrepreneurship ecosystem. Consequently, this strong ecosystem mediates technology’s impact, enhancing long-term economic productivity. The findings suggest that investment in digital infrastructure—particularly cybersecurity—and strict statistical validity are vital for policymakers to drive innovation-based growth and avoid the middle-income trap.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abarbanel, B. L., Singh, A. K., Bernhard, B., & Lucas, A. (2021). A comparison of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM in validating online casino e-servicescape theory. Proceedings of the Global Conference on Services Management, 2, 148.

Crăciun, A.-F., Țăran, A.-M., Noja, G. G., Pirtea, M. G., & Răcătăian, R.-I. (2023). Advanced modelling of the interplay between public governance and digital transformation: New empirical evidence from structural equation modelling. Mathematics, 11(5), 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051168

Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C., & Veiga, P. M. (2023). Interlinking institutions, entrepreneurship and economic performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(4), 902-926. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-07-2022-0640

Hruby, V. (2021). Structural equation modelling in the research of entrepreneurial orientation: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 17th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers. https://doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2021.19

Huber, F., Ponce, A., Rentocchini, F., & Wainwright, T. (2022). The wealth of (open data) nations? Open government data, country-level institutions, and entrepreneurial activity. Industry and Innovation, 29(8), 992-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2022.2098495

Loukis, E., Soto-Acosta, P., & Pazalos, K. (2013). Using structural equation modelling for investigating the impact of e-business on ICT and non-ICT assets, processes and business performance. Operational Research, 13(1), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-011-0110-x

Maloney, W. F., Cirera, X., & Ferreyra, M. M. (2025). Reclaiming the lost century of growth: Building learning economies in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2205-6

Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023). Digital technology adoption in SMEs: What technological, environmental and organizational factors influence SMEs' ICT adoption in emerging countries? Global Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199

Shuman, O. R. (2025). A structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis of the development and challenges of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in rural indigenous communities of Guyana. Texila International Journal of Management, 11(2), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJMG.2015.11.02.Art023

Siyanbola, W. O., Aderemi, H. O., Egbetokun, A. A., & Sanni, M. (2011). Framework for technological entrepreneurship development: Key issues and policy directions. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 1(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2011.11002

Suliman, L. A. A., & Adedokun, M. W. (2025). Modeling the nexus between technological innovations and institutional quality for entrepreneurial development in Southeastern Europe. Sustainability, 17(3), 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031173

Vuković, M. (2024). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM comparison in estimating the predictors of investment intention. Croatian Operational Research Review, 15(2), 131-144. https://doi.org/10.17535/crorr.2024.0010

World Bank Data Help Desk. (2024). Data validation and diagnostics. World Bank. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906534-data-quality-and-effectiveness

World Bank Data Help Desk. (n.d.). Methodologies. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906531-methodologies

World Bank. (2024a). Business ready 2024. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2021-2

World Bank. (2024b). Indicators - World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator

World Bank. (2025a). Digital progress and trends report 2025.

World Bank. (2025b). World development indicators (WDI). World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

How to Cite

Muhammad Irfan, & Eddy Soeryanto Soegoto. (2026). Peran Infrastruktur Teknologi dalam Mengakselerasi Ekosistem Kewirausahaan dan Produktivitas Ekonomi. Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.55606/jumbiku.v6i1.6715

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.