Work Ethic and Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Work Behavior and the Moderating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Authors

  • Savira Erens Rahmadina Universitas Widya Gama Malang
  • Adya Hermawati Universitas Widya Gama Malang
  • Survival Survival Universitas Widya Gama Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jumbiku.v6i1.6819

Keywords:

Employee Performance, Innovative Work Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, SEM-PLS, Work Ethic

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of work ethic on employee performance by including innovative work behavior as a mediating variable and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) as a moderating variable. The study was conducted on Civil Servants at the Batu City Agriculture and Food Security Office using a quantitative explanatory approach. The entire population of 83 employees was used as respondents through a saturated sampling technique, so this study is expected to be able to describe the empirical conditions comprehensively. Quantitative data were collected through distributing questionnaires compiled based on research variable indicators and then analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) method with the help of SmartPLS software version 4. The results of the analysis indicate that work ethic has a positive and significant influence on employee performance. In addition, work ethic is also proven to have a positive and significant influence on innovative work behavior. Further findings indicate that innovative work behavior acts as a partial mediating variable in the relationship between work ethic and employee performance, meaning that work ethic can improve performance both directly and through increasing innovative behavior. However, organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is not proven to moderate the relationship between work ethic and employee performance. This indicates that the role of OCB in strengthening or weakening the influence of work ethic on performance is not yet significant in the context of the organization studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.

Anoraga, P. (2001). Psikologi kerja. Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (2013). Human resource management: An experiential approach (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include contextual performance: The role of employee personality and job knowledge. Advances in Organizational Development and Job Design, 3, 71–98.

De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Drucker, P. F. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Routledge.

Firmansah, Y., Azhar, M., Sarker, M. A. R., Yudha, A. T. R. C., & Syahruddin, S. (2023). Promoting innovative work behavior: Investigating the role of Islamic work ethic. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics, 6(1), 1–23.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Structural equation modeling: Metode alternatif dengan partial least square (PLS). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Hamdani, A. B. N. (2025). Pengaruh budaya kerja Islami, lingkungan kerja, dan perilaku kerja inovatif terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan OCB sebagai variabel moderating (Studi pada karyawan BTPN Syariah KC Semarang) [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga].

Hanan, Z., Dalimunthe, R. F., & Absah, Y. (2024). The influence of employee engagement and self-efficacy on employee performance through innovative work behavior at PT Asam Jawa Medan. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(8), 3947–3958. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i8.9898

Hermawati, A., Nurwati, N., Suhana, S., Machmuddah, Z., & Ali, S. (2020). Satisfaction, HR, and open innovation in the tourism sector. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), Article 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040182

Hermawati, A., Suci, R. P., Suhermin, & Survival. (2019). Biplot and cluster analysis of satisfaction level and the interest of MSMEs human resources of tourism sector in East Java to transglobal leadership, QWL, employee involvement, employee performance level, responsible marketing, and tourism sustainable competitiveness. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(8), 348–363.

Hidayat, S. (2024). Pengaruh budaya kerja Islami, motivasi kerja Islami, dan perilaku kerja inovatif terhadap kinerja karyawan dengan OCB sebagai variabel moderating (Studi pada BPRS Artha Surya Barokah Semarang) [Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga].

Istanti, F., Hermawati, A., & Mas’ud, M. (2022). Analisis efek transformational leadership dan locus of control terhadap innovative work behavior melalui organizational citizenship behavior. Jurnal Manajemen Sains dan Organisasi, 3(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.52300/jmso.v3i2.5514

Jufrizen, J., & Erika, V. (2021). The influence of work ethics, work engagement, and personality on employee performance. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration, 1(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.54443/ijebas.v1i1.25

Kamilasari, T., Prahiawan, W., & Maria, V. (2024). The influence of motivation and work ethics on employee performance through work behavior as an intervening variable at PT Prima Land, Pandeglang Regency. Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences, 3(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.55927/esa.v3i2.8506

Keraf, S. (2000). Etika lingkungan hidup. Kompas.

Loi, S. (2024). The influence of innovative work behavior and job satisfaction on employee performance. Review: Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 1(5), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.59422/rjmss.v1i05.328

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Mangkunegara, A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan (14th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.

Ni’matusholikha, R. N. A. (2021). Pengaruh budaya organisasi terhadap innovative work behavior dimediasi oleh etos kerja Islami [Skripsi tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang].

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307

Prasojo, E. (2018). Reformasi birokrasi dan kinerja pelayanan publik. Yayasan Administrasi Publik.

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior. Prentice Hall.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual factors on creativity: A review and implications for research. Journal of Management, 30(5), 933–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800303

Sinamo, J. H. (2011). 8 etos kerja profesional. Institut Darma Mahardika.

Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1991). Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriadi, Mas’ud, M., & Daud, A. (2023). Pengaruh etos kerja dan dukungan organisasi terhadap kinerja pegawai melalui peran kapabilitas inovasi sebagai variabel intervening. Jurnal Cash Flow, 2(1), 324–335.

Swastika, I. G., Kirana, K. C., & Septyarini, E. (2025). The influence of work ethic, work discipline, and communication on employee performance at the Yogyakarta Special Region Tourism Office. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 6(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.430

Trang, I., & Dotulong, L. O. H. (2023). Innovative behavior as a mediating impact of work ethic in improving the performance of business actors in South Minahasa Regency in the era of global economic recession. Society, 11(2), 603–625. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.585

Walz, S. M., & Niehoff, B. P. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: Their relationship to organizational effectiveness. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 24(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634800002400301

Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Wonda, T. A. (2024). Examination of organizational citizenship behavior influence on employee performance attainment: An empirical investigation. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2418422

Downloads

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Savira Erens Rahmadina, Adya Hermawati, & Survival Survival. (2026). Work Ethic and Employee Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Work Behavior and the Moderating Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior . Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 350–371. https://doi.org/10.55606/jumbiku.v6i1.6819

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.