Evaluation of Environmental Sanitation in Laino Central Market Operations: Assessing Compliance with Health Standards in Raha City

Vifi Febriani; Ridwan Adi Surya; La Ode Ahmad Nur Ramadhan; La Ode Midi; Asramid Yasin; Wa Ode Hastiani Fahidu

doi:10.55606/ijhs.v5i3.5735

Authors

Vifi Febriani Universitas Halu Oleo
Ridwan Adi Surya Universitas Halu Oleo
La Ode Ahmad Nur Ramadhan Universitas Halu Oleo
La Ode Midi Universitas Halu Oleo
Asramid Yasin Universitas Halu Oleo
Wa Ode Hastiani Fahidu Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/ijhs.v5i3.5735

Keywords:

Environmental Sanitation, Laino Central Market , Market Sanitation, Public Health, Sanitation Assessment

Abstract

Sanitation issues are critical and need to be addressed by all parties, as they are closely linked to public health. Sanitation refers to efforts aimed at preventing disease by eliminating or controlling environmental factors that contribute to disease transmission. One of the public service facilities that must organize proper sanitation is the public market. This study aims to evaluate the environmental sanitation of Sentral Laino Market in Raha City. The research utilizes a quantitative descriptive analysis method to assess various parameters of the market’s sanitation. A total of 14 parameters were measured based on the Regulation of the Indonesian Minister of Health No. 17 of 2020. The parameters and their respective values are as follows: Market Building (75%), Stall Building (63%), Waste Disposal (60%), Sewage and Drainage (57%), Toilets (88%), Clean Water (83%), Food and Foodstuff Sales Places (57%), Control of Disease Transmitting Animals (33%), Market Security (50%), Lighting, Temperature and Humidity (100%), Hand Washing Places (50%), Parking Places (75%), Traders/Employees (40%), and Visitors/Buyers (25%). Among the 14 components assessed, 5 components met the required standards, while 9 components did not meet the eligibility criteria. The overall category value, based on the “yes” answers from all the components, totaled 56 points (60%). According to the Regulation of the Indonesian Minister of Health No. 17 of 2020 concerning Healthy Markets, a market is considered eligible if the total score reaches ≥70%. Therefore, the Sentral Laino Market does not meet the standards for a healthy market. This study highlights the need for significant improvements in various aspects of the market’s sanitation to ensure public health and safety. It is crucial for local authorities and stakeholders to address these sanitation challenges to create a healthier environment for both traders and consumers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aliyah, I. (2017). Conceptual understanding of traditional markets in urban areas. Cakra Wisata, 18(2).

2. Aldo, D. (2019). Identification of healthy home sanitation with the multifactor evaluation process method. Journal of Science, Technology and Industry, 16(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.24014/sitekin.v16i2.5807

3. Anggraeni, M. D., & Aslamiyah, M. (2018). Overview of environmental sanitation in Blambangan Market, Banyuwangi in 2017. Scientific Journal of Public Health Students, 3(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.24036/student.v3i1.283

4. Amelia, C., Susaldi, S., & Rosidi, R. (2021). Analysis of hygiene and sanitation implementation in Kemiri Muka Market, Depok City. Journal of Environmental Health, 11(2), 99-102.

5. BPS, Muna Regency. (2024). Batalaiworu Sub-district in Figures.

6. Candra Susanto, P., Ulfah Arini, D., Yuntina, L., Panatap Soehaditama, J., & Nuraeni, N. (2024). Quantitative research concepts: Population, sample, and data analysis (A literature review). Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v3i1.504

7. Gusti, A. (2021). Environmental sanitation of traditional markets in Padang and Payakumbuh. Journal of Occupational Health Safety and Environment, 1(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.25077/jk3l.1.1.3-11.2020

8. Gusti, A., & Nilam Sari, P. (2020). Environmental sanitation of traditional market in Padang and Payakumbuh. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 15(3), 268-273. http://www.ripublication.com

9. Junaidi, J. S., & Meirisa, F. (2021). The effect of promotion, price, word of mouth, and layout on purchasing decisions at Diamond Supermarket Palembang City. Management Student Research Publication, 3(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.35957/prmm.v3i1.1613

10. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 of 2020 concerning Healthy Markets. Ministry of Health, Jakarta.

11. Novianti, D., & Pertiwi, W. E. (2019). The implementation of environmental sanitation in elementary schools: 2018 inspection report from Kramatwatu Sub District, Serang District, Banten Province. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 11(3), 175-188. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v11i3.2019.175-188

12. Oluwole, P. D., Olowoporoku, O. A., & Odunsi, O. (2017). Assessment of environmental sanitation behaviour of market traders in selected markets in Ibadan, Nigeria. Advances in Environmental Research, 6(3), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.12989/aer.2017.6.1.025

13. Pramesti, P. U., & Fauziyah, S. (2022). Multifunctional building design: Market and public facilities in Semarang Regency. Journal of Vocational Service, 2(3), 173-176. https://doi.org/10.14710/Gading

14. Rahma, D. E., Paka, J., Rinando, A., Malik, M. Z., & Afifah, N. (2023). Effect of physical environmental conditions on air temperature changes at State University of Malang. 3(4), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.17977/um067v3i4p151-162

15. Rasmin, & Marhadi, A. (2022). Raha City, the Laino Central Market for the people of Muna. KABANTI: Jurnal Kerabat Antropologi, 6(2), 353-366.

16. Rizki Herwianti, C. O., & Wijayanti, Y. (2023). Overview of the condition of environmental sanitation facilities in traditional markets in Semarang City in 2022. HIGEIA Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 7(2), 303-311. https://doi.org/10.15294/higeia.v7i2.63501

17. Rusman Efendi. Market health status in terms of location and building in Ciputat Market and BSD Modern Market, South Tangerang City. Jurkessia, 9(1), 9-14.

18. Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 on Trade. Ministry of State Secretariat, Indonesia.

19. Sari, K. P. (2021). Analysis of temperature and humidity differences in ceramic walled rooms. Inkofar Journal, 1(2), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.46846/jurnalinkofar.v1i2.156

20. Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: PT Alfabet.

21. Sucipto, C. D. (2019). Environmental Health. Yogyakarta: Goshen Publishing.

22. Sukresno, H., Hakim, A., Wike, & Afandhi, A. (2019). Evaluation of waste management regulations in Minulyo traditional market, Pacitan, Indonesia. Jurnal Internasional Teknik dan Teknologi Sipil (IJCIET), 10(05), 806-814.

23. Setiamy, A. A., & Deliani, E. (2019). Innovation strategy and home industry performance in increasing consumer purchase interest in Medan's Sukaramai Market. Journal of Management Science METHONOMIX, 2(1), 45-52.

24. Tola, T. T., Soewarno, A. A., & Kunci, K. (2024). Redesign of Laino Raha Central Market in Muna District with green architecture emphasis. 2(1), 1-12.

25. Unaradjan, D. D. (2019). Quantitative Research Methods. Publisher Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta.

26. UNICEF, & WHO. (2020). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000-2017. New York Geneva: UNICEF & WHO.

27. WHO. (2022). Sanitation [Internet]. WHO. Available from: sanitation%2C WHO monitors global, management of wastewater and excreta.

28. Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., & Sherbinin, A. de. (2022). Environmental Performance Index [Internet]. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058334284&partnerID=40&md5=ba59657f76bc374ef24c860e353164bd

29. Yuningsih, R. (2019). Health promotion strategy in improving the quality of environmental sanitation. 10(2), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v10i2.1391