Studi Komparasi: Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility pada Berbagai Sektor Industri yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v5i1.5475Keywords:
Comparative Study, Corporate Social Responsibility, Industrial Sector, SustainabilityAbstract
The implementation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is not uniform in every industrial sector. The characteristics, challenges and expectations of stakeholders from each sector lead to different CSR approaches. This study aims to identify differences in CSR disclosure patterns between these sectors, and to assess whether these sectors tend to be more open in reporting their social responsibilities. This study uses a descriptive quantitative design by collecting secondary data in the form of annual reports of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2020-2022. The sample consisted of 56 companies from various industrial sectors. The results showed that the energy and coal, consumer, property and construction sectors tended to focus more on CSR programs in environmental aspects and social. On the other hand, companies in the financial, health, technology, media and telecommunications sectors focused more on CSR programs in social and community aspects. The implications of this study are to add to the empirical literature on CSR practices in Indonesia, especially related to sectoral variations. This broadens the understanding of how certain industrial sectors tend to be more or less transparent in disclosing CSR activities. In addition, this study provides insight into corporate social responsibility and analysis for investors to invest in companies that carry out sustainability activities.
Downloads
References
Athanasopoulou, A., Marti, E., Risi, D., & Schlindwein, E. (2025). How companies restrain means–ends decoupling: A comparative case study of CSR implementation. Journal of Management Studies, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13043
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia. Business & Society, 44(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658
Das, S. K. (2022). An empirical study on the impact of the corporate social responsibility of the Indian corporate sectors. Journal of Economic Integration, 37(4), 790–808.
Ervits, I. (2023). CSR reporting in China’s private and state owned enterprises: A mixed methods comparative analysis. Asian Business & Management, 22(1), 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-021-00147-1
Laskin, A. V. (2018). The third-person effects in the investment decision making: A case of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Communications, 23(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-10-2017-0099
Lestari, A. A., Nabila, F., & Cahyani, A. (2025). Environmental incidents, pemberitaan media dan praktik pengungkapan sustainability report. Jurnal Bisnis dan Keberlanjutan, 2(1), 25–35.
Mariappanadar, S., Maurer, I., Kramar, R., & Muller-Camen, M. (2022). Is it a sententious claim? An examination of the quality of occupational health, safety and well-being disclosures in global reporting initiative reports across industries and countries. International Business Review, 31(2), 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101922
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.
Mirza, F., Hasan, A., Younas, S., & Ghazi, B. R. (2023). CSR and consumer loyalty: Moderating role of consumer characteristics: A comparative study of the banking industry. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47067/ramss.v6i1.293
Ong, T. (2012). Impact of corporate governance on sustainability reporting: Empirical study in the Australian resources industry. School of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, 1–20.
Pudza, I. W. (2023). Comparative research implementation of CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) in various sectors of the Indonesian Stock Exchange. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 9(4), 489–499.
Rogulenko, T. M., Postnikova, L. V., & Postnikova, D. D. (2022). The place and role of quality in the system of consolidated reporting: Mandatory reporting. Journal of Corporate Reporting, 17(1), 121–136.
Shaft, T. M. (2004). A model of the global and institutional environmental performance. Business & Society, 43, 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650304262962
Shofia, L., & Anisah, N. (2020). Kinerja lingkungan dan corporate social responsibility mempengaruhi profitabilitas perusahaan. JAD: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Keuangan Dewantara, 3(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.26533/jad.v3i2.678
Song, S., Wai, A., Cheung, K., & Jun, A. (2023). Mandatory CSR disclosure and CEO pay-performance sensitivity in China: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. International Journal of Managerial Finance, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-04-2022-0181
Yasin, S. F., Idris, H., & Rijal, A. (2025). Pengaruh corporate social responsibility terhadap profitabilitas perusahaan sub sektor pertambangan logam dan mineral lainnya yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3, 1–15.
National Center for Corporate Reporting. (2024). ASRRAT 2024 – National Center for Corporate Reporting. https://nccr.id
Smith, V., Lau, J., & Dumay, J. (2022). Shareholder use of CSR reports: An accountability perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1658–1676.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
