Peran Spesialisasi Industri Auditor dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Audit

Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Abc

Authors

  • Syarifah Mudaim Qubro Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Ardhi Islamudin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v5i3.5789

Keywords:

Audit Quality, Auditor, Industry Specialization, Public Accounting Firm, Qualitative Case Study

Abstract

This study aims to explore the role of auditor industry specialization in improving audit quality at ABC Public Accounting Firm. Using a case study approach with an interpretive qualitative paradigm, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with three auditors who had direct experience with clients from various industry sectors. The findings indicate that auditors’ knowledge of the unique characteristics of the client’s industry plays a central role in shaping more contextual, in-depth, and responsive audit implementations. Such specialization enables auditors to identify sector-specific risks, design appropriate audit strategies, and provide added value to clients through insights that go beyond standard compliance. Furthermore, industry specialization is not merely a reflection of technical mastery but also serves as a foundation for auditors to interpret risks more accurately, enhance decision-making processes, and strengthen their professional judgment. The study highlights how industry-specific expertise fosters reflective audit practices that align with sector dynamics, thus contributing to higher audit quality and trust in financial reporting. In addition, the research emphasizes the importance of continuous learning and professional development in maintaining relevance amid evolving business environments. Overall, this study provides meaningful insight into how industry specialization enriches audit practices and reinforces the professional value of auditors within the public accounting firm environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, C., & Faisal, F. (2023). Audit fees, audit tenure, auditor industry specialization, audit firm size, and audit quality: Evidence from Indonesian listed companies. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 10(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v10i2.27750

Apriati, A. N., Prasetyoningrum, A. K., Falahunal, F., Fatimah, S., Hidayah, N., & Fitri, A. (2025). Peran KAP dalam meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas laporan keuangan [The role of KAP in increasing transparency and accountability of financial reports]. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 125–136.

Hutapea, N., & Ghozali, I. (2022). Pengaruh rotasi rekan kerja auditor, spesialisasi industri auditor, dan family ownership terhadap kualitas audit. JIMEA: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, dan Akuntansi, 6(2), 1810–1827.

Kosasih, M., & Arfianti, R. I. (2020). Kemampuan spesialisasi industri auditor memoderasi pengaruh audit tenure dan kualitas audit serta pengaruh rasio keuangan terhadap audit report lag. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.46806/ja.v9i1.660

Koven, J., Murni, Y., & Wahyoeni, S. I. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kualitas audit. Jurnal Relevan, 2(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.35814/relevan.v2i2.3431

Kusumah, R. W. R., Arnan, S. G., & Asikin, B. (2023). Pengaruh akuntabilitas auditor, spesialisasi auditor di bidang industri klien, dan karakteristik personal terhadap kualitas audit (Studi kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik daerah Kota Bandung). Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(6), 9192–9101. http://journal.yrpipku.com/index.php/msej

Mulyani, S., & Rahayu, F. (2023). The effect of auditor independence, audit tenure, and auditor rotation on audit quality: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Accounting and Finance Research, 4(2), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijafr.v4n2p55

Pangkey, R. I. J., Kantohe, M., & Karwur, Y. (2024). Pengaruh insentif pajak dan kualitas audit terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi Modern, 5(1), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.53682/jaim.vi.4458

Pratama, Y. A., & Dewi, K. (2024). Auditor industry specialization and audit quality: The moderating role of audit committee effectiveness. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 17(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol17no1.5

Ritonga, P., & Mulyati, H. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang menentukan audit judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(1), 15–22.

Teri, & Ridwan, H. (2021). Kualitas audit ditinjau dari fee audit (Studi kualitatif Siri’ Na Pacce pada KAP Ardaniah Abbas). Program Studi Akuntansi, Universitas Fajar Makassar, 146–167.

Tina, A. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit dengan integritas sebagai variabel moderasi pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Kota Medan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetitif, 5(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35446/akuntansikompetif.v5i3.1010

Valentine, H. (2022). Analisis pengaruh spesialisasi industri auditor, ukuran kantor akuntan publik, dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap kualitas audit: Studi pada perusahaan sektor pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal FinAcc, 6(12), 1881–1889.

Wicaksono, A. T., & Purwanto, A. (2021). Pengaruh audit tenure, rotasi KAP, ukuran KAP, dan spesialisasi industri auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 10(2), 1–15. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/31015/25458

Zunita, L., Khikmah, S. N., & Mranani, M. (2022). Pengaruh audit capacity stress, auditor spesialisasi industri, komite audit, dan alignment effect terhadap kualitas audit. Borobudur Accounting Review, 2(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.31603/bacr.7025.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-11

How to Cite

Qubro, S. M., & Islamudin, A. (2025). Peran Spesialisasi Industri Auditor dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Audit: Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Abc. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 5(3), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v5i3.5789

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.