Pelatihan Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Argumentasi Ilmiah

Authors

  • Tri Ayu Lestari Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Fakhruddin Fakhruddin Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Andi Agung Wahyu Utama Universitas Citra Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jpmi.v4i2.5045

Keywords:

Academic Training, Scientific Argumentation, Soft Skills

Abstract

In the digital era, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology increasingly influences education, requiring students to possess stronger critical thinking and scientific argumentation skills. This Community Service (PKM) activity aimed to enhance the scientific argumentation abilities of the fifth-semester students of the Physics Education Program at Universitas Nusa Cendana. The training involved 25 students over five days, consisting of three main phases: demonstration and brainstorming, mentoring, and scientific argumentation practice through structured debates and scientific presentations. Evaluation results indicate that the training successfully improved students' understanding of scientific argumentation, with an average score of 4.35 for skill improvement and 4.12 for confidence enhancement. Seventy percent of participants stated that the training positively impacted their skills, while 88% felt that the materials were sufficient. However, challenges in managing group discussions and the training duration were identified, needing improvements for future implementations. With a hands-on approach and interactive learning, this training proved effective in enhancing students' critical thinking, academic communication, and scientific argumentation skills. This PKM initiative could serve as a model for developing innovative learning methods to prepare competent future educators in the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4(February), 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132

Andrews, R. (2010). Argumentation in higher education. Taylor & Francis. http://www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk

Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., & Lukiati, B. (2018). Profil keterampilan berpikir analitis mahasiswa calon guru IPA dalam perkuliahan biologi umum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 66–70. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppipa.v2n2.p66-70

Chairiyati, L. R. (2011). Meningkatkan motivasi belajar bagi mahasiswa kurang berprestasi melalui program mentoring. Humaniora, 2(1), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v2i1.3000

Edwards, B. I., & Cheok, A. D. (2018). Why not robot teachers: Artificial intelligence for addressing teacher shortage. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 32(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2018.1464286

Hasyim, F. (2018). Mengukur kemampuan berpikir analitis dan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa calon guru fisika STKIP Al Hikmah Surabaya. JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Veteran), 2(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.31331/jipva.v2i1.591

Kyriacou, C. (2007). Essential teaching skills (3rd ed.). Nelson Thornes. https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0710361

Limna, P., Jakwatanatham, S., Siripipattanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., & Sriboonruang, P. (2022). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education during the digital era. Advance Knowledge for Executives, 1(1), 1–9. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4160798

Mailool, J., Retnawati, H., Arifin, S., Kesuma, A. T., & Putranta, H. (2020). Lecturers’ experiences in teaching soft skills in Teacher Profession Education Program (TPEP) in Indonesia. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.215

Nadliroh, U. (2022). Membangun critical thinking mahasiswa melalui metode debat dalam perkuliahan Pancasila dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di STAI Pati Jawa Tengah. Al-Burhan, 12(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.56322/jab.v12i1.15

Pantan, F. (2023). ChatGPT dan artificial intelligence: Kekacauan atau kebangunan bagi pendidikan agama Kristen di era postmodern. Diegesis: Jurnal Teologi, 8(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.46933/dgs.vol8i1108-120

Purnamasari, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan berbicara dalam presentasi ilmiah mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi STKIP Taman Siswa Bima. Sintaks: Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.57251/sin.v2i2.525

Purnamasari, R. (2024). Peningkatan kemampuan berbicara mahasiswa dalam presentasi ilmiah melalui metode simulasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, 8, 51396–51401.

Saphier, J., Haley-Speca, M. A., & Gower, R. (2008). The skillful teacher: Building your teaching skills (6th ed.). Research for Better Teaching. http://www.rbteach.com

Simanjuntak, M. F., & Sudibjo, N. (2019). Meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan memecahkan masalah siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis masalah. JOHME: Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 2(2), 108–117. https://doi.org/10.19166/johme.v2i2.1331

Tambunan, M., Wulandari, T., & Junior, D. D. (2024). Peran guru sebagai fasilitator dalam meningkatkan kemandirian belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4), 393–402.

Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(December 2024), 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100355

Wijaya, S. A. (2019). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa melalui metode pembelajaran debat aktif pada mata kuliah kewirausahaan. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan), 3(2), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.29408/jpek.v3i2.1711

Downloads

Published

2025-05-16

How to Cite

Tri Ayu Lestari, Fakhruddin Fakhruddin, & Andi Agung Wahyu Utama. (2025). Pelatihan Terpadu untuk Meningkatkan Argumentasi Ilmiah. JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT INDONESIA, 4(2), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpmi.v4i2.5045

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.