Analysis of Students' Perception of Small Group Discussion Techniques in Expository Text Writing Activities at SMAN 17 Pekanbaru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v5i3.6059Keywords:
Collaborative Learning, Expository Writing, Small Group Discussion, Students’ Perception, Thematic AnalysisAbstract
This study aims to analyze students’ perceptions of the implementation of small group discussion techniques in expository text writing activities. The research employed a qualitative descriptive design and was conducted at SMAN 17 Pekanbaru on 29 August 2025. The population consisted of 200 eleventh-grade students, and 20 students were selected purposively as the sample. Data were collected through classroom observation, face-to-face interviews, and documentation of students’ expository texts. Thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) was applied to analyze the data. The findings reveal that students generally perceive small group discussion positively. The technique helped students generate ideas, enrich vocabulary, improve text organization and cohesion, and build confidence in writing. However, several challenges were identified, including unequal participation, occasional code-switching to Bahasa Indonesia, and limited time allocation. Documentation of students’ texts confirmed improvements in structure, coherence, and lexical variety after participating in group discussions. The study concludes that small group discussion is an effective strategy to support students’ expository writing, with recommendations for structured group roles, better time management, and active teacher facilitation.
Downloads
References
Amer, A. (2013). Teaching EFL/ESL reading and writing: A balanced approach. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 5–15.
Black, A. (1985). Expository writing in the classroom. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Longman.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2021). Small group discussion and EFL writing performance. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 411–419.
Maghfuroh, L. (2015). The use of small group discussion in teaching descriptive writing. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 45–56.
McCafferty, S., & Jacobs, G. (2013). Cooperative learning and second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Nyumba, O. T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Ecology and Society, 23(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
Rizki, N., & Indrayani, R. (2024). Small group discussion in analytical exposition writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 100–112.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
Sugiyono. (2022). Qualitative research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Vance, T. (2021). Writing as a skill in EFL: Challenges and strategies. Language Education Journal, 15(2), 112–123.
Zainurroziqi, M. (2021). Improving students’ hortatory exposition writing through small group discussion. ELT Journal, 8(2), 75–85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
