Narasi Akuntan di Balik Angka: Studi Etnografi tentang Pengambilan Keputusan Etis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jebaku.v5i2.5340Keywords:
Ethical decision-making, professional accountants, organizational pressure, personal values, organizational culture, code of ethics, qualitative research, ethnographyAbstract
This study aims to understand how professional accountants navigate ethical dilemmas in decision-making across various sectors, including public, private, and governmental institutions. The main issues addressed are organizational pressure, conflicts with personal values, and organizational culture in ethical decision-making. A qualitative approach using ethnographic methods was employed, collecting primary data through interviews with 20 professional accountants, as well as secondary data from organizational documents such as professional codes of ethics and internal policies. Data analysis was conducted through reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing, with validation using triangulation techniques. The findings indicate that organizational pressure is the dominant factor influencing ethical decision-making, particularly in the private sector, where 70% of respondents reported experiencing such pressure. Despite this, 85% of respondents stated that they upheld personal values such as integrity, although 15% admitted compromising those values due to external pressures. Ethical organizational culture was found to be stronger in government and educational sectors compared to the private sector. The main strategies used by accountants to address ethical dilemmas were consulting with colleagues (55%) and referring to professional codes of ethics (30%). The study concludes that organizational pressure, personal values, and organizational culture play significant roles in shaping ethical decisions among accountants. Therefore, it is essential for organizations to strengthen ethical culture, provide professional training, and establish support mechanisms that protect accountants in the face of external pressures.
Downloads
References
Athanassoulis, N. (2013). Virtue ethics. Britania Raya: A&C Black.
Fahmi, I. (2020). Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Fitri, F. (2020). Pengaruh tekanan (Pressure), kesempatan (Opportunity), rasionalisasi (Rationalization), dan kapabilitas (Capability) terhadap kecurangan pengadaan barang/jasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(1), 69–84.
Hartono, J. (2019). Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi (Edisi ke-11). Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2024). Karakteristik laporan keuangan. Diakses dari IAI Global.
International Federation of Accountants. (n.d.). About IFAC. Retrieved December 30, 2024, from https://www.ifac.org
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (tanpa tahun). Peran akuntan sangat fundamental. Diakses pada 18 Desember 2024, dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/informasi-publik/publikasi/berita-utama/Peran-Akuntan-Sangat-Fundamental
Kinasih, C. L. T. M. (2020). Tantangan etika bisnis dalam dunia bisnis: Sebuah refleksi filosofis tentang pentingnya etika dalam dunia bisnis. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(12), [halaman artikel jika diketahui]. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Unisadhuguna Business School Jakarta, Indonesia.
Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Prananjaya, K. P. (2017). Hubungan faktor internal dan eksternal terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan etis. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi, 18(1), 80–101.
Nurlia, A. P., & Hermanto, S. B. (2019). Pengaruh tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, dan pengendalian internal terhadap kecurangan akuntansi. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi. https://doi.org/e-ISSN: 2460-0585
Sary, D. R. (2015). Pengaruh pengalaman auditor, komitmen profesional, tekanan ketaatan, dan nilai etika organisasi terhadap persepsi pertimbangan etis (Studi empiris pada kantor BPKP–RI Perwakilan Provinsi Riau). Jom FEKON, 2(2), 1–10.
Sendyona, C. C. (2020). ENRON Scandal: Evidence of a missed opportunity to detect and halt fraud and bankruptcy. European Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance Research, 8(5), 54–65. https://www.ecrtd-uk.org/journal/ejaf/vol8-no5-pp54-65
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.