The Relationship Between Cognitive Processes and Language Production in Foreign Language Learners

Authors

  • Sofiyani Nasution Universiversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Huda Hizkia Ahmad Universiversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nadila Tanjung Universiversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Yani Lubis Universiversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v4i3.3312

Keywords:

cognitive processes, working memory, attentional control, language production, foreign language learning

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between cognitive processes and language production among foreign language learners by analyzing the roles of working memory, attentional control, and self-monitoring in shaping spoken and written performance. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, task-based classroom observations, and analysis of learners’ written outputs. The findings indicate that cognitive mechanisms significantly influence the fluency, accuracy, and complexity of learners’ language production. Learners with stronger working memory capacity demonstrated better ability to integrate information, construct coherent sentences, and maintain linguistic accuracy, while those with limited memory resources tended to rely on simplification strategies and reduced syntactic complexity. Attentional control was found to be crucial in managing competing linguistic demands, especially during spontaneous speech. Additionally, self-monitoring contributed to improved error correction and refinement of ideas, particularly in writing tasks, where learners have more time for cognitive planning compared to spoken communication. Differences between oral and written performance further highlight how task modality interacts with cognitive load. Overall, the study emphasizes that cognitive functioning plays a pivotal role in determining learners’ language output, and suggests that instructional practices aimed at strengthening cognitive skills may enhance communicative competence in foreign language learning contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The relationship between working memory capacity and L2 oral performance under task-based careful online planning condition. Tesol Quarterly, 46(1), 165-175.

Guhe, M. (2020). Incremental conceptualization for language production. Psychology Press.

Hajiyeva, B. (2024). Language Anxiety in ESL Learners: Causes, Effects, and Mitigation Strategies. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 119-133.

Halim, A., Atikah, D., Yang, C. C., & Rahayu, S. (2023). EFL Students’ Practices of Self-Regulated Language Learning in Speaking. Langkawi: Journal of The Association for Arabic and English, 97–112. https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v0i0.5482

Hammons, S. G. (2025). Articulation as a Predictor of Cognitive Decline.

Lima, S. A. (2023). The Role of L1 (First Language) in L2 (Foreign or Second Language) Learning: An Enquiry at the Secondary Level (Doctoral dissertation, BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY).

Luquin, M., & García Mayo, M. del P. (2025). Tracking EFL children’s learning: A longitudinal study of noticing and incorporation of features in model-based and self-correction tasks. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688251361100

Ohala, J. J. (1981). Articulatory constraints on the cognitive representation of speech. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 111-122). North-Holland.

Schwering, S. C., & MacDonald, M. C. (2020). Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 14, 68.

Shahid, S. H., Khan, M. A., & Ishtiaq, M. (2022). An Overview of the Information Processing Approach and its Application to Memory, Language, and Working Memory. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(3), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-III)54

Sun, B. & Révész, A. (2021). The Effects of Task Repetition on Child EFL Learners’ Oral Performance. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 24(2), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31382

Suzuki, S., & Kormos, J. (2023). The multidimensionality of second language oral fluency: Interfacing cognitive fluency and utterance fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 45(1), 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000899

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Sofiyani Nasution, Huda Hizkia Ahmad, Nadila Tanjung, & Yani Lubis. (2024). The Relationship Between Cognitive Processes and Language Production in Foreign Language Learners. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sastra Inggris, 4(3), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v4i3.3312

Similar Articles

<< < 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>