Investigating The Readiness and Satisfaction of Students and Lecturers For The Integration of Chatgpt in English Academic Writing at Ganesha University of Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/jupensi.v5i3.5763Keywords:
Academic Writing, ChatGPT, Learning Tool, Readiness, SatisfactionAbstract
The study explored the potential of ChatGPT as a learning tool in English language education, focusing on both students’ and lecturers’ readiness and satisfaction. While both groups demonstrated a positive outlook toward the integration of ChatGPT into their learning processes, the research highlighted various nuances in how each group interacted with the technology. Students showed a high degree of readiness in using ChatGPT for basic tasks such as accessing information and enhancing their motivation for learning. However, their readiness for self-directed learning and goal-setting was notably lower, indicating a need for further development in utilizing ChatGPT for more autonomous and personalized learning experiences. This suggests that while ChatGPT can be a useful tool for structured learning, its role in fostering independent learning skills needs to be strengthened. On the other hand, lecturers expressed strong confidence in using ChatGPT for academic purposes, especially in terms of facilitating administrative tasks, grading, and providing additional learning resources. However, they voiced concerns about the potential overreliance on technology, which could hinder the development of critical thinking skills in students. The lecturers stressed the importance of integrating ChatGPT as a supplementary tool, rather than replacing traditional teaching methods that foster deep learning and personal engagement. Thematic analysis of the responses also pointed out that while ChatGPT was appreciated for improving focus and accessibility, it raised concerns about the loss of human interaction in the learning process. Students and lecturers both acknowledged the value of human mentorship, emotional support, and personalized guidance, which ChatGPT could not fully replicate. Therefore, while ChatGPT holds promise for enhancing learning, its integration should be approached with a balanced consideration of technological advantages and the irreplaceable role of human involvement in education.
Downloads
References
Alafnan, M. A., Dishari, S., Jovic, M., & Lomidze, K. (2023). ChatGPT as an educational tool: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations for communication, business writing, and composition courses. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Technology, 3(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.37965/jait.2023.0184
Allison, S. Z. (2022). The impact of educational technology and frequency of usage. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 3(2), 104-119. https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v3i2.89
Almulla, M. A. (2024). Investigating influencing factors of learning satisfaction in AI ChatGPT for research: University students perspective. Heliyon, 10(11), e32220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32220
Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep448. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13417
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Belanger, F., & Jordan, D. H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies, tools, and techniques. Idea Group. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-878289-63-6
Bolliger, D. U. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
Bradley, V. M. (2021). Learning management system (LMS) use with online instruction. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 68-92. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.36
Buholayka, M., Zouabi, R., & Tadinada, A. (2023). The readiness of ChatGPT to write scientific case reports independently: A comparative evaluation between human and artificial intelligence. Cureus. https://www.cureus.com/articles/155141-is-chatgpt-ready-to-write-scientific-case-reports-independently-a-comparative-evaluation-between-human-and-artificial-intelligence.pdf
Cai, Q., Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2024). Factors influencing learner attitudes towards ChatGPT-assisted language learning in higher education. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2261725
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2988510
Cortina, M. S. (2023). The why, what, and how of publishing a manuscript: A blend of art and science. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(8), 2930. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1930_23
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Vighio, M. S., Alblehai, F., Soomro, R. B., & Shutaleva, A. (2024). Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students' performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(14), 18695-18744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x
Dilzhan, B. (2024). Teaching English and artificial intelligence: EFL teachers' perceptions and use of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/fwy92
Elegba, E. O. F., & Adah, P. D. (2015). SATISFACTION. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320045022_SATISFACTION
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080022000013518
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023). AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2
Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners' speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814
Galindo-Domínguez, H., Delgado, N., Losada, D., & Etxabe, J. M. (2024). An analysis of the use of artificial intelligence in education in Spain: The in-service teacher's perspective. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 40(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2284726
Gannon, F. (2008). Language barriers. EMBO Reports, 9(3), 207. https://doi.org/10.1038/EMBOR.2008.14
Gede Bayu Kartika Yasa, I., Hery Santosa, M., & Putu Indra Kusuma, I. (2023). Investigating EFL students' satisfaction and expectation in virtual learning environments. Premise: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 855-875. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i3.7451
Guerriero, S. (2014). Teachers' pedagogical knowledge and the teaching profession.
Huang, H., Zheng, O., Wang, D., Yin, J., Wang, Z., Ding, S., Yin, H., Xu, C., Yang, R., Zheng, Q., & Shi, B. (2023). ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: The potential of multi-modal large language model. International Journal of Oral Science, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y
Huang, Hanyao, Zheng, Ou, Wang Dongdong, Yin Jiayi, Wang Zijin, Ding Shengxuan, Yin Heng, Xu Chuan, Yang Renjie, Zheng Qian, & Shi Bing. (2023). ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: The potential of multi-modal large language model. International Journal of Oral Science, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-023-00239-y
Huang, J., & Tan, M. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: Writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10164801/
Huang, Jingshan, & Tan Ming. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: Writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10164801/
Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2010.05.004
Justiana, P. P., Santosa, M. H., & Mahendrayana, G. (2022). English teachers and students readiness in utilizing MALL in English distance learning context. ELTIN Journal: Journal of English Language Teaching in Indonesia, 10(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v10i2.p103-112
Ka, C., & Chan, Y. (2023). Is AI changing the rules of academic misconduct? An in-depth look at students' perceptions of "AI-giarism." https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03358v2
Kallestinova, E. D. (2011). How to write your first research paper. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 84(3), 181. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3178846/
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2023.102274
Kiong, J. F. (2023). The impact of technology on education: A case study of schools. Journal of Education Review Provision, 2(2), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v2i2.153
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. Relc Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Lemos, S., & Pedro, N. (2012). Students' expectation and satisfaction in post-graduate online courses. ICICTE Proceedings, 568. http://www.icicte.org/Proceedings2012/Papers/14-3-Lemos.pdf
Lesia Viktorivna, K., Andrii Oleksandrovych, V., Iryna Oleksandrivna, K., & Nadia Oleksandrivna, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: What are we afraid of. Arab World English Journal, 8, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.18
Liu, Y., Han, T., Ma, S., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Tian, J., He, H., Li, A., He, M., Liu, Z., Wu, Z., Zhao, L., Zhu, D., Li, X., Qiang, N., Shen, D., Liu, T., & Ge, B. (2023). Summary of ChatGPT-related research and perspective towards the future of large language models. Meta-Radiology, 1(2), 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.METRAD.2023.100017
Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2022.100076
Luo, S., & Zou, D. (2025). University learners' readiness for ChatGPT-assisted English learning: Scale development and validation. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12886. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12886
Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the potential of an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL faculty members. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3195-3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z
Mohammed, A. A. Q., Al-ghazali, A., & Khalid A. S. Alqohfa. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT uses in higher studies: Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix, 2(2), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v2i2.55
Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2023). ChatGPT in academic writing: Maximizing its benefits and minimizing the risks. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 71(12), 3600-3606. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_718_23
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023). Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
Ngo Thi Thuy An, Tran Thanh Tu, An Gia Khuong, & Nguyen Phuong Thy. (2024). ChatGPT for educational purposes: Investigating the impact of knowledge management factors on student satisfaction and continuous usage. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1367-1378. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2024.3383773
Ningsih, P. S. S., Santosa, M. H., & Kusuma, I. P. I. (2023). EFL high school students' satisfaction in online learning and expectations towards blended learning: An investigation. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 5(2), 204-223. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i2.13148
Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computers & Education, 54(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
Purnomo, W., Syafitri, D., & Raflesia, C. (2022). The role of blended learning model in learning for students. LITERATUR: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajaran, 3(1), 54-70. https://doi.org/10.31539/literatur.v3i1.4999
Rahimi, A. R., & Sevilla-Pavón, A. (2024). The role of ChatGPT readiness in shaping language teachers' language teaching innovation and meeting accountability: A bisymmetric approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100258
Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., Santini, F. de O., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sastra Inggris
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
